๐—œย ๐˜๐—ต๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ด๐—ต๐˜ย ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒย ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜€๐—ฎ๐—ด๐—ฒย ๐˜„๐—ฎ๐˜€ย ๐—ฐ๐—น๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ.ย ๐—œ๐˜ย ๐˜€๐˜๐—ถ๐—น๐—นย ๐—ณ๐—ฎ๐—ถ๐—น๐—ฒ๐—ฑ.

One of the hardest leadership lessons Iโ€™ve learnt had nothing to do with writing the perfect message. It came from seeing a clear, carefully considered message land badly inside an organisation.

That experience taught me this: in change and crisis, the message is only part of the work.

At the time, I thought the hardest part was making the decision.
It wasnโ€™t.
The hardest part cameย ๐˜ข๐˜ง๐˜ต๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ.

I believed the messages were as clear and empathetic as I knew how to make them. I had thought carefully about the wording. I had tried to balance honesty with care.

Itย ๐˜ด๐˜ต๐˜ช๐˜ญ๐˜ญย landed badly.

For many people, it felt like the rug had been pulled from under them.
Because the issue is often not just the message. It is the readiness of the people expected to carry it.

Too often, organisations focus on getting to a tidy narrative and a polished set of messages. But what sits between leadership intent and organisational trust is the layer in the middle.

And that layer cannot be treated as a โ€˜delivery mechanismโ€™.

They are the people who have to answer the questions. Hold the tension. Face the emotion in the room. Represent leadership, while often being affected by the decision themselves.

That means they need more than briefing. They need:
โ€ข clarity on what the organisation is really saying
โ€ข language they can stand behind
โ€ข space to process what it means for them personally
โ€ข and accountability for how they show up once the message goes live
Looking back, that is what I underestimated.

Not the message itself. But the human and organisational burden of carrying it.

Being part of a process is not the same as being ready to hold the line when the moment becomes real.

And when that readiness is missing, even clear messages can fracture on contact.

That, to me, is where so many leadership and crisis communications fail.
Not because the wording is wrong. But because organisations treat communication as a message-delivery exercise, instead of a process of shared leadership, through critical layers of the organisation.

The lesson I took from that period was this: If you want a difficult message to land with credibility, you donโ€™t simply prepare the messageโ€”you must also prepare the people who will have to carry it.

That is leadership work. Not just comms work.

๐—œ๐—ณย ๐˜†๐—ผ๐˜‚ย ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ฒ๐—ฑย ๐—ป๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒย ๐—ฐ๐—น๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐˜๐˜†,ย ๐—น๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜€๐—ต๐—ถ๐—ฝย ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜€,ย ๐—ผ๐—ฟย ๐—ฐ๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐˜€๐—ถ๐˜€ย ๐—ฝ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฝ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฑ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜€ย ๐˜€๐—ผย ๐˜๐—ฟ๐˜‚๐˜€๐˜ย ๐—ต๐—ผ๐—น๐—ฑ๐˜€ย ๐˜‚๐—ป๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ฟย ๐—ฝ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜€๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐—ฒย โ€”ย ๐—ต๐—ฎ๐—ฝ๐—ฝ๐˜†ย ๐˜๐—ผย ๐—ฐ๐—ต๐—ฎ๐˜.ย ๐—ก๐—ฎ๐—ฒ๐—ฒ๐—บ๐—ฎย ๐—œ๐˜€๐—บ๐—ฎ๐—ถ๐—นย |ย ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒย ๐—ฅ๐—ฒ๐˜€๐—ฒ๐˜